ALTP Interview Quotes in Precis Form
Original interviews conducted by Mark Goldstein 1997-98 Terse summaries by Byron Davies -- April 4, 1998 Critical Issues
- instruction/technology in focused learning
- grow local talent instead of importing
- teacher fears, funding, training, tech support
- professional development to support effective use
- funds (capital and operating), teacher knowledge, tech support, effect of technology on education organizations
- still in pioneering phase, need for organizational transformation
- 20-30 paid days/year for teacher training
- teachers need Internet at home
- attitudes are a barrier
- need focus on equipment and software
- administrator needs technology too
- professional development
- state leaders need to understand importance of education to stateís future
- what is the outcome goal for technology, technology parity across districts, professional development
- incorporation of technology into curriculum
- state recognition of education as a priority
- education is critical to future of Arizona
- need stable, ongoing funding for technology
- need technology-specific funding, with dedicated budget for support
- teacher training, reduce administrative load, interact with parents
- itís a system problem
- teacher development, how to accelerate learning with technology
- focus on the classroom teacher, more training
- public and school awareness of potential of technology
- focus on actual use
- earmark technology funding
Educational and Societal Trends
- amazing power on desktops
- need to validate effectiveness of software
- kids know more than teachers about technology
- need to align technology education with business needs
- teamwork
- technology makes learning more fun
- public schools are losing their monopoly status
- need to learn, think, and work globally
- project-based learning is important
- technology enhances teachers efforts
- inter-district technology equity, constructivist learning
- industry needs well-educated high-school graduates
- older teachers and administrators need to understand generational differences
- school monopoly is evaporating
- children expect technology at school
- students have access to unlimited information through the Internet -- teacher must serve as a guide
- technology and independent thinking are now critical skills
- printing press led to earlier cluster of revolutions -- technology may wreak similar change
- students have better technology at home than at school
- students need a variety of skills, including career development and entrepreneurism
- students are no longer tabula rasa -- they get info (right or wrong) from the Internet
- technology will transform work
- lifelong learning is emerging
- real-time feedback (ìassessmentî) permits real-time adjustment of curriculum
- public awareness of technology is driving policy, asynchronous learning is important
Role of Government
- government money has high leverage as seed money in technology introduction
- Department of Education (fed or state?) should control money, in two tiers (1) same basic amount to all schools, (2) competitive grants large enough to provide critical mass
- state governments should drive technology policy
- state matching funds for technology
- need strong support of Governor
- state needs focus on the future of education
- state government should fund technology, with approaches depending on characteristics of school district
- state, not federal government, is appropriate level for driving technology in schools
- government should fund technology-rich models as well as strive for equity
- federal government has a role: only they could do E-Rate
- states should evaluate software (like textbooks)
- state should bring all schools up to a basic level of technology
- funding should come from diverse sources (public and private), need measurable results (learning goals) to support public funding, will take time/money/people to reach goals
- state should ensure schools are doing their job (graduating good students)
- governments should fund network infrastructure for education
- education technology needs separate state funding, so schools wonít spend it on something else
- state and federal government should ensure base level of education
- the Governor can support/is supporting technology literacy, school innovation, and industry/school cooperation
- state should ensure technology equity across school districts
- government should lead technology planning process and provide support for technology in schools
- state and federal governments need to spend more on education
- government can help ensure interoperable networking infrastructure
- state should specifically target technology in education to ensure our graduates are competitive
- federal government should support R&D in learning technology, state government should help train teachers and modernize technology in schools
- local government, driven by parents, should take a larger role in education
- technology should be funded like land, buildings, infrastructure, tools, and textbooks; federal and state governments should fund basic instructional R&D; state government should develop measurements of school effectiveness
Skill Development and School-to-Work
- basic problem is teacherís discomfort with technology (wrong category?)
- technology or no, students need better thinking skills than theyíre getting now
- students need operational skills, awareness of technology issues, and willingness to learn forever
- concerned that schools may give bright kids marketable skills too early, preventing some from going on to university
- an English teachers effectively uses technology to accelerate learning of writing skills
- some schools do exciting things with multimedia production; all should
- teachers need to use technology themselves, for their own purposes, before advocating it to their students
- students need skills to use information, not just access it
- technology increases the opportunity for accessing and using knowledge, for using creativity
- schools should help provide students workplace experience,with co-op programs or simulations
- technology literacy is fundamental in high-tech employment
- most critical issue for business is workforce development, which requires a good K-12 educational experience
- technology literacy is fundamental in higher education
- as society becomes more dependent on technology, it should supply people who are more capable in using technology; global competition requires technology competitiveness
- need to know higher-level thinking skills as well as computer tools
- critical thinking skills more important than technology skills per se
- technology supports individualized education and distributed collaboration
- education should focus on concepts and functional skills (such as presentation development) rather than just on tools (such as Powerpoint)
- technology can truly enhance learning, in core subjects, through stimulus, input, simulations, etc.
- all students need to understand the basics of word processing, databases, spreadsheets, web searches, evaluating software
- students should learn to touch type and to use the computer and standard software packages
- kids need to understand how to assimilate, manage, and use information
- kids need to enjoy and understand basics of math, reading, writing, computer skills
- computer is important as an expander of learning opportunities, not as an end in itself
- students need communication skills: reading, writing, use of coherent sentences
- no workforce entrant should be without computer skills
- there is an opportunity for Arizona to become a leader in workforce development and lifelong learning, based on effective use of technology, thus improving the way business is done
- students need to develop comprehension, conceptualization skills
- schools need to cooperate and share resources; high schools are already successfully providing skills (e.g., C++ programming, network administration) that immediately qualify graduates for high-paying ($35K) jobs; schools should also stress work socialization skills
- unable to find appropriately trained graduates, companies are training their own; business needs people with advanced technical skills (routers, bridges, NT administration)
- students should learn to interpret and use information, not just access it
- students need to read and ìkeyboardî at very early age; if you know that, computer can tell you what to do (???)
- school-to-work seems like a remedial program -- kids should learn discipline earlier than high school
- industry says they need certain skills, but their employment practices donít follow what they say, but they do want people to be familiar with software (???)
- expectations for high school graduates continually increase, but qualifications donít: education doesnít change; society will force education to change, using technology as a lever
- technology can and should be used to support learning, decision support, and performance support
- technology in schools will lead to technologically prepared students
- students need real literacy, technological literacy, and job-skill literacy
- basic computer skills are now fundamental to participation in society
- students should use technology automatically, as appropriate; perhaps schools should develop a pre-engineering curriculum
- everyone should know word processing, databases, and the Internet
Role of Higher Education and Industry
- industry is dissatisfied with knowledge of graduates, but schools provide a rounded education as well as serving industry
- industry needs to help by offering workplace experiences and by helping to define the skills needed in the workforce
- industry should partner with schools, donate used equipment, and assist in classroom
- successful industry partnerships already exist, but Arizona must do more to continue to attract new business
- industry wants to see ìauthenticî measurements of students abilities: portfolios, not multiple choice tests
- industry needs to stop complaining and simply state what they see as necessary basic skills
- industry can help us learn about and implement technology in schools
- industry should go to schools to teach about the workplace, and provide opportunities to visit the workplace
- educators should give parents and the public realistic expectations about the potential gains and costs of technology; industry should help articulate the vision and support the costs of it
- industry needs to contribute to the development of a solid work force -- and is, but mainly as remedial education
- biggest question is the role of industry; industry should bring teachers into the workplace; education system should deploy existing standards for workplace skills and technology skills, and make classroom more relevant to industry
- industry can supply mentors to school; universities and industry can help schools plan and implement technology
- need a database or electronic portfolio to keep track of studentsí learning from many sources
- industry needs to let schools know how important computer literacy is
- industry should show students how knowledge and technology is used in the workplace
- industry can help by supply technology expertise for schools, both for installation and for training school staff
- industry can help via mentoring, funding, educating state government; a vibrant economy is based on talent and technology
- higher education can help K-12 via library content access, local communication connections, non-traditional training experiences, flexible class scheduling for teachers and capable students, and modeling the use of technology
- higher education can help train teachers in technology and available curriculum content
- industry needs to inform students and government that technology is important
- industryís needs are clear; schools need to change to satisfy them, while still providing a well-rounded education
- industry should include local school support in their mission statement; technology will help dissolve barriers between school and industry
- industry needs to work more closely with teachers, provide internships, and demonstrate realistic scenarios
- higher education needs to educate teachers about technology and its uses as a tool to support curriculum
- industry should adopt schools, contribute technology, articulate workplace needs, explore partnerships with K-12 and higher education
Economic Impact
- if we donít do ìthese thingsî, industry will continue to hire from out-of-state
- if we donít succeed with school-to-work, Arizona will suffer economically
- if we donít have an adequately trained workforce, industry will leave
- if we donít ìsucceedî, weíll continue to import talent, business will move elsewhere, and our students will be left behind
- if we donít meet technology challenge, our students will be left behind and our economy will suffer
- if studentís donít have technology skill, economic competitiveness will suffer
- industry wants to be here, but it needs a workforce skilled in learning, knowledgeable about work, and comfortable with technology
- technology, by transforming the economy from physical to informational, will help save the world from pollution and resource scarcity
- if we donít lead in technology, someone else will reap the benefits
- thereís little point attracting companies to Arizona if we donít prepare our people to work for them
Computers in the Classroom
- each kid needs a computer, with more emphasis on laptops in the higher grades
- one modern computer per four students, to promote collaboration and interaction
- technology supports individualized education and distributed collaboration
- 4-to-1 is a good starting point, but we need to move to 1-to-1; people need to have continuous access to a computer
- technology supports individual learning styles, such as visual learning
- state should support a minimum level of technology for all schools
- need to have computers in the home and in accessible community centers
- best use of technology is in individualizing instruction
- technology motivates learning in other curriculum areas
- schools need to use both teachers and technology; technology will make teachers more productive; eventually, weíll see the ìfree agentî teacher offering broadly distributed learning
- technology makes education more exciting, more flexible, more individualized, offering multiple chances to those who didnít ìget itî the first time
- students using multimedia learning score higher on exams, complete courses more often, and retain more, due to more active learning
- technology is a tool for all learning
- technology is primarily a tool; students also need critical thinking skills and group skills
- next-generation software will be intelligent, providing powerful learning environment for all subjects, supporting team-oriented learning and individual learning styles
- the basics -- reading, writing, arithmetic -- are still important, but technology will provide a ìsafeî learning environment for those subjects
- we canít afford one computer per student; 1:12 is absolute minimum; students need non-computer-based education, too, to promote rational thinking and contemplation
- computer ratio is not as important as perceived availability
Role of the Internet
- project-based, real-time learning is the way of the future; Internet resources support it, but a guide is needed
- Internet is great resource; teacherís role changes to navigator, facilitator
- administrative computing is being used a vehicle to get schools connected; hopefully, administrative loads will be reduced and the infrastructure will be used for education as well
- the Internet, combined with intelligent agents, will give access to legacy data and put intelligence into everyday objects
- the distributed multimedia communication made possible by the Internet will help students learn to self-direct, collaborate, communicate, and have a more positive outlook
- Internet makes vast amounts of information available, unfiltered, so people must learn critical reading and thinking skills
- endless net surfing is as bad as endless car cruising; we have to make sure students donít become self-absorbed in technology
- the educational technology that really counts is the Internet, which serves as the great universal library
- the impact of the Internet will be highly profound, though unpredictable
- digital encyclopedias on the web are just the tip of the forthcoming Internet iceberg
- distributed learning can make university classes available to school kids of any age, wherever they are and whenever theyíre ready
- Internet has made amazing amounts of information available to students worldwide
- Internet needs to be in the classroom and it needs to be used in all curriculum areas; video conferencing, authentic synthesized environments, simulations will be more powerful than the current classroom
- lack of school connectivity is holding back the potential of the Internet in the classroom
- the Internet is a potential instructional delivery system, but the content needs to be just as carefully evaluated as any other
- much faster networks will be here soon, making video conferencing a valuable educational tool
Administrative Support (most of these barely fit the category)
- each K-12 school should have a dedicated master technology teacher to train the teachers
- one of the first uses of technology should be to reduce the teacherís administrative load
- technical support of technology is critical, so that teachers donít get turned off by the glitches
- technology should be transparent: need local infrastructure support, district standardization and support, and outside support if necessary
- computers and networks should be used to reduce teacherís administrative load
Supporting and Maintaining Technology
- key school problem is the unaffordability of support for affordable computer technology
- federal programs provide inadequate funding for ongoing support; school districts must budget for it
- need to consider total costs of ownership: software and annual maintenance each amount to 1/3 of initial hardware purchase costs
- schools lack resources for maintenance; students are getting valuable experience while taking over part of the job
- two possibilities for maintenance/support: (1) hire people, (2) outsource so that all data is on someone elseís Internet server
- teachers shouldnít have to support technology; need appropriate staffing
- parents and the public need to understand the potential benefits and actual costs of technology
- teachers shouldnít maintain computers; trained people should, but perhaps it would be a good learning experience for students
- supporting and maintaining technology is the Achillesí heel of learning technology: support is tough, and expensive; possible answers: (1) budget and pay more, (2) reduce total cost-of-ownership, (3) use students
- schools need technical support, some internal, and some outsourced
- schools have to budget for technology maintenance just as they do for building maintenance
- schools canít afford to retain experienced technology people, so use students
- educational computer technology requires professional, appropriately compensated support
- students can do technical support
- university MBA programs and business should engage in ìexternshipsî to schools
Miscellaneous Stuff (some of these belong in Administrative Support)
- educational technology needs systematic support
- state needs a standardized current student attendance record keeping system
- technology should be an integral part of studentsí daily lives
- parents and community must be made aware of benefits and true costs of technology
- technology, by bringing the outside world into the classroom, can bring meaning to learning
- as Arizona economy changes from large companies to small, education must adapt
- new teachers may have technology skills, but still may not know how to use technology to support learning
- students need to become comfortable with technology, not just a particular platform
- the next generation of educational software needs to have a common look and feel
- the real benefit of technology is in freeing the teacher to be a mentor or guide
- some teachers adapt naturally to computers; others need more training, which needs funding
- teachers need time to adjust to technology and incorporate new ideas
- former teacher: principal had trouble adapting to my use of computer for lesson plans; students liked to see just how their grades were calculated
- schools need better ways to track dropouts/truants
- underutilized technology is just a waste of money
- teachers need time and training to adapt to technology
- technology will make it possible to manage individualized instruction
- real productivity gains come from improving processes; real improvement in education will come from changing how education works
- one route to technology is to have some students become technology specialists and participate in group projects as such
- new technology will help in the operation of the school as a multifaceted organization
- funding needs to be applied to faculty development; real gains from technology will require restructuring how we do work
- need system -- electronic portfolio -- to track studentsí acquisition of competencies
- using technology forces teachers to think harder about pedagogy
- elementary teachers have complete charge of their studentsí learning; they need to be given the training and tools to bring technology into the classroom
- the technology diffusion curve (segmented into innovators, latents, abeyants, phobics) can help guide technology introduction
- the E-Rate program will help bring technology to Arizona schools, particularly in rural areas
- libraries will continue to be a valuable learning resource
- current K-12 technology is limited, but the next generation -- based on cognitive psychology and studies of learning -- will be exciting
- the Technology Literacy Challenge Grant program has much potential, particularly if mechanisms are found to broadly share resulting experience
- availability of technology is less a barrier than the lack of knowledge about what to do with it
- technology can reduce administrative burdens
- state should support technology as one of many learning tools
- to achieve technology equity and to avoid using long-term capital to pay for rapidly depreciating equipment, technology should be paid for out of specially earmarked operating funds